USPTO serial 75478263
DAIRYGOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAIRYGOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
51149 Koln, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HORST M KASPER
HORST M KASPER FOREST DRWARREN, NJ 07059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | CHOCOLATE CONFECTIONERY MADE WITH CHOCOLATE, CHOCOLATE BARS, CHOCOLATE CANDIES, CHOCOLATE TRUFFLES; BAKER PRODUCTS AND CONFECTIONS, CAKES AND PASTRIES, CANDIES, CHOCOLATE CANDIES, SWEETS MADE WITH CHOCOLATE, SOLIDIFIED EDIBLE MASSES CONTAINING CHOCOLATES, CAST SWEETS CONTAINING CHOCOLATE, MOULDED SWEETS CONTAINING CHOCOLATE CHOCOLATE CHIPS, CHOCOLATE MOLDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |