USPTO serial 75478527
VECTOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VECTOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Battle Creek, MI
Battle Creek, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID A HERDMAN
DAVID A HERDMAN KELLOGG COP O BOX 3599BATTLE CREEK, MI 49016-3599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cereal derived food product to be used as breakfast food, snack food, or ingredient for making food; bagels; toaster pastries; cereal bars; and cereal based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 1, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |