USPTO serial 75478742
EZ-ACCESS VOTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EZ-ACCESS VOTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERTA L CHRISTENSEN
ROBERTA L CHRISTENSEN KOLEY JESSEN DAUBMAN & RUPIPER PC1 PACIFIC PL STE 8001125 S 103RD STOMAHA, NE 68124Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic voting system, comprising computer hardware and software for enabling the visually impaired, the hearing impaired, persons with physical disabilities, and persons who are illiterate or have other reading problems to vote for candidates and/or on issues in state, local, and national elections and referendums | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |