USPTO serial 75478861
PRIZMALITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2808893Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2004
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRIZMALITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
Innovative Concepts Unlimited, LLC
Coventry, CT
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Concepts Unlimited, LLC
Innovative Concepts Unlimited, LLC
Coventry, CT
Other trademarks owned by Innovative Concepts Unlimited, LLC
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harris A. Wolin
Harris A. Wolin Myers Wolin, LLC100 Headquarters PlazaNorth Tower, 6th FloorMorristown, NJ 07960Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | MICRON-SIZED PARTICLES OF VARIOUS ORGANIC OR INORGANIC MATERIALS, NAMELY, COATED AND UNCOATED GLASS BEADS AND MICA, FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PAINT AND RUST PREVENTERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRIZMALITE INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Concepts Unlimited, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Concepts Unlimited, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PRIZMALITE INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named PRIZMALITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 31, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 31, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 20, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |