Drawing for DINOSAUR PLANET

USPTO serial 75479235

DINOSAUR PLANET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DINOSAUR PLANET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JERALD E NAGAE

JERALD E NAGAE CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON &KINDNESS PLLC1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic interactive video game programs; video game software; computer game software; video game cartridges; and video game discs; video games machines for use with televisionsACTIVE—
028Toys, namely, toy action figures, articulated and non-articulated dolls, toy figures, bath-toys, bendable toys, dolls, toy stuffed animals, toy plush and cloth animals, plush dolls, puppets, coin-operated video games and pinball amusement apparatus, electric board games, electronic toys with a clock or timepiece feature, arcade games, hand-held pinball games, hand-held tabletop units for playing electronic games, hand-held units for electronic games, nonelectronic hand-held action skill games, skill and action games, stand alone video game machines, hand-held units with a visual display for playing electronic games that simulate a pet, decorative windsocks, board games, equipment sold as a unit for playing board games, card games, carrying cases for toys, kites, jigsaw puzzles, cube puzzles, manipulative puzzles, toy balloons, toy banks, toy binoculars, toy robots, toy vehicles, windup toys, and yo-yosACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 1, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 10, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 4, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 17, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 19, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance