USPTO serial 75479384
PRIZMALITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, CHRISTINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRIZMALITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALBERT W HILBURGER
ALBERT W HILBURGER PERMAN & GREEN425 POST RDFAIRFIELD, CT 06430UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | CRUMB AND RE-CYCLED RUBBER FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF AEROSOL PAINT, PAINT AND RUST PREVENTORS; PLASTIC IN THE FORM OF ELASTOMERICS AND EXTENDED POLYMERS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF AUTOMOTIVE AND GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | MOLD INJECTED GLASS PELLETS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF AUTOMOTIVE AND GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS EXCLUDING SHEETS OF PLATE GLASS FOR ARCHITECTURAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Concepts Unlimited, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Innovative Concepts Unlimited, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named PRIZMALITE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |