USPTO serial 75479962
OLD COUNTRY ROSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2815222Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2004
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OLD COUNTRY ROSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stoke-on-Trent, GB
WILMINGTON, DE
Stoke-on-Trent, GB
Stoke-on-Trent, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria A. Scungio
Maria A. Scungio Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge LLPF.D.R. Station; P.O. Box 130New York, NY 10150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Textile articles, protective tablemats, tablecloths, napkins, placemats, table runners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Doulton (UK) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by WWRD IPCO LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Doulton (UK) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Doulton (UK) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named OLD COUNTRY ROSES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 5, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 22, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |