USPTO serial 75480084
THE CHRYSLER BUILDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CHRYSLER BUILDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen W. Feingold
STEPHEN W FEINGOLD PITNEY HARDIN LLP7 TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate services, namely, leasing, brokerage, management, consultation, financing and investment services related to real estate; leasing of fully equipped executive office space, furnished corporate apartments and auxiliary facilities, namely, kitchen and banquet facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Real estate services, namely, development, building design and construction, construction planning, drafting and supervision of office buildings, hotels, restaurants, museums and libraries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 405 Lexington, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by 405 Lexington, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named THE CHRYSLER BUILDING
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 24, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |