Drawing for CHARLESBRIDGE

USPTO serial 75480307

CHARLESBRIDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHARLESBRIDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL A HIERL

MICHAEL A HIERL OLSON & HIERL LTD20 N WACKER DR 36TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
040MATERIAL TREATMENT, NAMELY, MANUFACTURE OF CUSTOM WOOD MOLDINGS FOR OTHERS AND MILLWORK SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 15, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 29, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 15, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 15, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 7, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance