USPTO serial 75480420
SOFTSPIKES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOFTSPIKES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ira C. Edell
IRA C. EDELL EDELL, SHAPIRO & FINNAN, LLC1901 RESEARCH BOULEVARD SUITE 400ROCKVILLE, MD 20850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FOOTWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |