USPTO serial 75480619
TECHNOLOGY USER PROFILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 2000
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TECHNOLOGY USER PROFILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Encinitas, CA
New York, NY
Encinitas, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREA VAN KAMPEN
ANDREA VAN KAMPEN ZD INC1 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Market research services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2000 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 1999 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |