USPTO serial 75480622
POWR-TRAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWR-TRAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-53797 Lohmar, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID TOREN
KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | DIFFERENTIALS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES FOR USE IN SEPARATE DRIVE AXLES OF FOR LOAD DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN SEVERAL DRIVE AXLES, IN PARTICULAR AS BEVEL GEARINGS, PLANETARY GEARINGS, WORM GEARINGS AND IN COMBINATION WITH EXTERNALLY OR AUTOMATICALLY CONTROLLED LOCKING DEVICES SUCH AS MECHANICAL CLUTCHES OR HYDRAULIC FRICTION CLUTCHES OR SWITCHABLE FREE-WHEELING DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |