USPTO serial 75480708
M2 SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWITZER, SANDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M2 SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ
Scottsdale, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROSEMARIE CHRISTOFOLO
ROSEMARIE CHRISTOFOLO LEWIS AND ROCA LLP40 N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85004-4429UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware, namely, systems comprised of CPUs, video monitors, keyboards and mice sold through the global computer network, catalogs and traditional retail and reseller channels | ACTIVE | Jan 30, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |