USPTO serial 75480857
CINENET CINEMA NETWORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CINENET CINEMA NETWORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Simi Valley, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSOLATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING DATA TO MANUFACTURERS OF ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION (AEC) COMPONENTS; PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS PERTAINING TO ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION (AEC) COMPONENTS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1993 |
| 037 | PROVIDING INFORMATION ON BUILDING COMPONENTS UTILIZED IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AND IN BUILDINGS, FACILITIES AND PLANT MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT VIA A GLOBAL NETWORK; CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | Jan 9, 1989 |
| 042 | CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING FIELD; PROVIDING GOVERNMENT AND REGULATORY INFORMATION RELATING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION (AEC) FIELD VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COLLECTING, ORGANIZING, CODIFYING AND PROVIDING ARCHETECTURAL AND ENGINEERING (aec) INFORMATION FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | Jun 14, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |