USPTO serial 75481351
MEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JERALD E NAGAE
JERALD E NAGAE CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON & ET AL1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | articulated and non-articulated dolls, bendable toys, play figures, board games; carrying cases for toys; decorative wind socks; electronic game equipment for playing video games; electronic game programs; electronic game equipment with a clock or timepiece feature; game cards; games; namely, action skill games, manipulative games, parlor games, role-playing games, and card games; hand-held pinball games; kites; nonelectric hand-held skill games; plush dolls; puppets; skill and action games; stuffed, plush and cloth toys; toy action figures; toy balloons; toy banks; toy puzzles; toy vehicles; toy whistles; toys, namely, mechanical toys, inflatable toys, bath toys, toy balls, toy music boxes, toy building blocks, toy modeling compounds, toy construction sets, toy mobiles, water squirting toys, roller skates and in-line skates; virtual pets; and, yo-yos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 1, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 27, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |