USPTO serial 75481468
TWELVE TALES CONKER 64
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TWELVE TALES CONKER 64?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Warwickshire, GB
Warwickshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JERALD E NAGAE
JERALD E NAGAE CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON ET AL1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-1344UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software, video game cartridges, video game discs and video game software | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, toy action figures, articulated and non-articulated dolls, toy figures, bath-toys, bendable toys, dolls, stuffed toy animals, plush and cloth animals, plush dolls, puppets, coin-operated amusement game machines; electric board games, arcade game machines, hand-held pinball game machines, tabletop units for playing electronic games, hand-held or worn units for playing electronic games, non-electronic hand-held skill games, skill and action games, stand-alone video game machines and parts therefor, hand-held or worn units with a visual display for playing electronic games that simulate a pet, decorative windsocks, board games, equipment sold as a unit for playing board games, card games, carrying cases for toys, kites, jigsaw puzzles, cube puzzles, manipulative puzzles, toy balloons, toy banks, toy binoculars, toy robots, toy vehicles, toy whistles, windup toys, yo-yos | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |