USPTO serial 75482039
E RESORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E RESORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cartersville, GA
Cartersville, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN G SMITH
KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK FOR THE TRANSFER AND DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION FOR THE HOSPITALITY, TRAVEL AND CORPORATE MEETING INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |