USPTO serial 75482680
BANK.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BANK.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DENISE A TURNER
DENISE A TURNER BUTERA BEAUSANG COHEN & BRENNAN630 FREEDOM BUSINESS CTRKING OF PRUSSIA, PA 19406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | providing information regarding financial products and services via a global computer network and providing electronic commerce via a global computer network, namely, on-line banking, on-line financial investment in the field of securities, on-line credit card application services, on-line merchant banking services, on-line mutual fund brokerage services, on-line securities brokerage services, on-line insurance brokerage services in the fields of life, health and accident insurance, and other related on-line banking products and services, namely, commercial mortgage, home equity, consumer credit, automobile, and retail loans | ACTIVE | Jun 9, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |