Drawing for ISG

USPTO serial 75482906

ISG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR

JEFFREY L VAN HOOSEAR KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES FEATURING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE TO RESELLERS OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; SUPPLY OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE AT WHOLESALE TO RESELLERS OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; MAIL AND/OR ELECTRONIC CATALOG SERVICES FEATURING COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWAREACTIVE—
038OPERATING AND PROVIDING A BULLETIN BOARD DISPLAYING TECHNICAL INFORMATION RELATING TO COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWAREACTIVE—
039TRANSPORTATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE BY AIR, TRUCK, OR RAIL, TO RESELLERS OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; STORAGE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR RESELLERS THEREOFACTIVE—
042COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER SYSTEM INTEGRATION AND CONFIGURATION SERVICES VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK OR BY OTHER MEANS FOR RESELLERS OF COMPUTERS; COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, COMPUTER INTEGRATION AND CONFIGURATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS FOR RESELLERS OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS AND THE DESIGN OF COMPUTERS FOR COMPUTER RESELLERS; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION FOR RESELLERS OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWAREACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 9, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Feb 21, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 18, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 6, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 6, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance