Drawing for ACTIVEFORECOURT

USPTO serial 75482916

ACTIVEFORECOURT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPIVAK, ANDREW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTIVEFORECOURT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven N. Terranova

STEVEN N TERRANOVA COATS & BENNETT PLLP O BOX 5RALEIGH, NC 27602-0005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for controlling and monitoring one or more of convenience store operations, retail fuel dispensing systems, payment authorization functions and terminals, electronic cash registers, underground fuel storage containers, dispensers, car wash machinery, video security systems, lottery terminals, money order networks, QSR (Quick Service Restaurant) functions, and electronic safesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2000EX2MSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
May 18, 2000EX2DSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Mar 29, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 2, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 15, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 24, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance