USPTO serial 75483581
ELECTRONIC ORIGINAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 29, 2002
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ELECTRONIC ORIGINAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Document Authentication Systems, Inc.
Baltimore, MD
Other trademarks owned by Document Authentication Systems, Inc.
Document Authentication Systems, Inc.
Baltimore, MD
Other trademarks owned by Document Authentication Systems, Inc.
Baltimore, MD
BALTIMORE, MD
BALTIMORE, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Avsec
Andrew J. Avsec Crowell & Moring LLPP.O. Box 10395Chicago, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE [AND HARDWARE] FOR THE ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION, STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL OF AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS USING SOPHISTICATED CRYPTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY AND PROVIDING ACCESS, VERSION AND DISTRIBUTION CONTROLS TOGETHER WITH A SECURE ELECTRONIC STORAGE FACILITY, ALL FOR USE IN THE CONTROL OF DOCUMENTATION OR OTHER INFORMATION OBJECTS IN MORTGAGE, LEASING, PHARMACEUTICAL AND OTHER BUSINESS APPLICATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS USING SOPHISTICATED CRYPTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY AND PROVIDING ACCESS, VERSION AND DISTRIBUTION CONTROLS, ALL FOR USE IN THE CONTROL OF DOCUMENTATION OR OTHER INFORMATION OBJECTS IN MORTGAGE, LEASING, PHARMACEUTICAL AND OTHER BUSINESS APPLICATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS USING SOPHISTICATED CRYPTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY AND PROVIDING A SECURE ELECTRONIC STORAGE FACILITY, ALL FOR USE IN THE CONTROL OF DOCUMENTATION OR OTHER INFORMATION OBJECTS IN MORTGAGE, LEASING, PHARMACEUTICAL AND OTHER BUSINESS APPLICATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Document Authentication Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Document Authentication Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by EORIGINAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EORIGINAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EORIGINAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named ELECTRONIC ORIGINAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 7, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |