USPTO serial 75484444
GIGACHECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GIGACHECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-40699 Erkrath, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LANCE J LIEBERMAN
LANCE J LIEBERMAN COHEN PONTANI LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 5TH AVE STE 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176-0091UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CLEAN AIR MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS AND DEVICES, NAMELY, PASSIVE COLLECTORS FOR COLLECTING AIR-BORNE PARTICLES AND SUBSTANCES FOR USE IN DETERMINING AIR CONTENT, SENSORS FOR DETECTING AND MEASURING AIR-BORNE DUST PARTICLES AND SUBSTANCES FOR DETERMINING AIR CONTENT, AND ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR PROCESSING SIGNALS FROM SENSORS AND COLLECTORS AND FOR OUTPUTTING INFORMATION AND DISPLAY DATA RELATING TO DETERMINED AIR CONTENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |