USPTO serial 75484665
X EYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 9, 2002
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with X EYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto M5J 2L7, CA
Toronto, OntarioM5J 2L7, CA
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
ODYSSEY FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MISSISSAUGA, CA
Other trademarks owned by ODYSSEY FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George A. Pelletier, Jr.
George A. Pelletier, Jr. Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street, 22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ENABLING TRADING OF SECURITIES, TRACKING OF POSITIONS AND TRANSACTIONS, MANAGEMENT OF ALL ASPECTS OF PROFILE INFORMATION, REPORTING AND PROSPECTIVE CLIENT'S OBJECTIVES AND INVESTMENT CONSTRAINTS, AND ON-LINE ACCESS OF ABOVE INFORMATION FOR USE IN THE AREAS OF RELATIONSHIP AND WEALTH MANAGEMENT AND SALES FORCE AUTOMATION BY MEMBERS OF THE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMMUNITY SUCH AS BROKERAGES, INVESTMENT COUNSELORS, MONEY MANAGERS, FINANCIAL PLANNERS, BANKS AND INSURANCE COMPANIES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | CUSTOM DESIGNING OF SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SYSTEMS INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPMENT; CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF MANAGEMENT OF TECHNICAL PROJECTS, DESIGN FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, DATABASE ADMINISTRATION; COMPUTER SYSTEMS-RELATED CONSULTATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VPI HOLDINGS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VPI HOLDINGS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by X. EYE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VISIONEERING PARTNERS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by X. EYE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ODYSSEY FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named X EYE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |