USPTO serial 75484732
ORION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL E SOBEL
MICHAEL E SOBEL GRAHAM & JAMES LLP600 HANSEN WAYPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Golf clothing, namely, golf shoes, golf gloves, golf hats, golf shirts, and golf wind breakers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2001 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |