USPTO serial 75484737
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
GB-London W9 1EL, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W BECKER
ROBERT W BECKER ROBERT W BECKER & ASSOC11896 N HWY 14 STE BTIJERAS, NM 87509UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Silicon chips, computer software, for use in dental imaging, that may be downloaded from a global computer network; computer programs, for use in dental imaging | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | X-ray diagnostic apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing an on-line bulletin board in the field of dental imaging; computer services, namely providing on-line facilities for real-time interaction with other computer users concerning dental imaging; providing dental information; providing a computer or electronic bulletin board in the field of dental imaging; rental of dental equipment; X-ray technician services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |