USPTO serial 75485165
LEAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Emeryville, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tsan Abrahamson
TSAN ABRAHAMSON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COUNSELLEAPFROG ENTERPRISES INC6401 HOLLIS ST STE 150EMERYVILLE, CA 94608-1070Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | EDUCATIONAL INFORMATION AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY AN ON-GOING TELEVISION PROGRAM PRIMARILY DIRECTED TOWARD THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF TODDLERS, PRE-SCHOOLERS AND GRADE SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN IN THE FIELDS OF MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, READING, LITERATURE, SPELLING, ENGLISH AND FOREIGN LANGUAGES, MUSIC, ART, SOCIAL STUDIES, HISTORY, GEOGRAPHY, ASTRONOMY, GEOLOGY, TECHNOLOGY, BUSINESS OPERATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, BUSINESS, ECONOMICS, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by S & S Bidco I, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Knowledge Universe, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LeapFrog Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by S & S Bidco I, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named LEAP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |