USPTO serial 75485463
NEXPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2675308Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 14, 2003
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NEXPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rochester, NY
Rochester, NY
Rochester, NY
ROCHESTER, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRISTEN H. SORENSEN
KRISTEN H SORENSEN HUNTON & WILLIAMS200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Printing machines, namely, digital color electronic printing presses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 6, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEXPRESS Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEXPRESS Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEXPRESS Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named NEXPRESS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |