USPTO serial 75485977
PIERRE BALMAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PIERRE BALMAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BIENNE, CH
BIENNE, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JESS M COLLEN
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, P.80 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUETHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BUILDINGOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | watches and parts thereof | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SWATCH GROUP MANAGEMENT SERVICES AG (THE SWATCH GROUP MANAGEMENT SERVICES SA) (THE SWATCH GROUP MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD.)
- Other trademarks owned by SWATCH GROUP MANAGEMENT SERVICES AG (THE SWATCH GROUP MANAGEMENT SERVICES SA) (THE SWATCH GROUP MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD.)
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named PIERRE BALMAIN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 24, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |