Drawing for SM@RTFIREWALL

USPTO serial 75485991

SM@RTFIREWALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BENMAMAN, ALICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SM@RTFIREWALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin A. Cahill

KEVIN A CAHILL LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP600 W BROADWAY STE 2600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer software design for others; Computer software product development for others; and Computer software programming for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2000ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 17, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance