USPTO serial 75486155
SM@RTPROTOCOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SM@RTPROTOCOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin A. Cahill
KEVIN A CAHILL LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP600 W BROADWAY STE 2600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software design for others; Computer software product development for others; and Computer software programming for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 23, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |