USPTO serial 75486303
UNDERNEATH.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNDERNEATH.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Computerized online search and ordering service featuring retail distribution of undergarment tee shirts, socks | ACTIVE | Aug 3, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |