USPTO serial 75486658
F.S.A.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with F.S.A.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Weston, Ontario, M9N 1H5, CA
Weston, Ontario, M9N 1H5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRANK ZAID
FRANK ZAID OSLER HOSKIN & HARCOURTP O BOX 50FIRST CANADIAN PLTORONTO, ON M5X 1B8Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | floor covering products namely, carpeting, floor tiles, hardwood and ceramic | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Providing a marketing and business management program which includes pricing incentives, training, promotion, merchandising and operational support in the sale of floor covering products namely, carpeting, floor tiles, hardwood and ceramic | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING FOR THE TRAINING OF OTHERS FOR PROMOTIONAL, MERCHANDISING AND OPERATIONAL SUPPORT IN THE SALE OF FLOOR COVERING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, CARPETING, FLOOR TILES, HARDWOOD AND CERAMICS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |