Drawing for GAME MASTER SERIES

USPTO serial 75486703

GAME MASTER SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAME MASTER SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Jacobs-Meadway

ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY BALLARD SPAHR ANDRES & INGERSOLL LLP1735 MARKET ST 51ST FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009collection of interactive multimedia computer software games and programsACTIVEMay 15, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 16, 2002EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Feb 25, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 12, 2001RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Sep 26, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 26, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance