Drawing for PATCH BOOSTER

USPTO serial 75487643

PATCH BOOSTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PATCH BOOSTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANDREW R BASILE

ANDREW R BASILE YOUNG & BASILE PC3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3197UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010PERMANENT HEART ASSIST DEVICE UTILIZING INTRA ARTERIAL AIR PRESSURE TO ASSIST THE CIRCULATING ASSIST MACHINERY AND CONTROLS THEREFOR; PERCUTANEOUS ACCESS DEVICE CONSISTING OF A DISK IMPLANTABLE BENEATH THE SKIN AND A COLLAR PROTRUDING THROUGH THE SKIN AND A COLLAR PROTRUDING THROUGH THE SKIN FOR USE IN TRANSMITTING FLUID, AIR OR ELECTRICITY ACROSS EXTRENDING THROUGH THE COLLAR AND ATTACHMENTS THEREFORE; AND IMPLANTED BLOOD PUMP AND ATTACHMENTS THEREFORE; AND AN EXTERNAL DRIVE UNIT SERVING AS A PUMP ACTUATOR AND CONTROLLER AND ATTACHMENTS THEREFORACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 8, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Mar 1, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 3, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 15, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 15, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 23, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 7, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance