Drawing for CAREER MATRIX

USPTO serial 75487869

CAREER MATRIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAREER MATRIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TIMOTHY E EAGLE

TIMOTHY E EAGLE VARNUM RIDDERING SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLPP O BOX 352GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-0352UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035EMPLOYMENT AGENCY, EMPLOYMENT COUNSELING AND RECRUITING EMPLOYMENT OUTPLACEMENT SERVICES, EMPLOYEE RELOCATION AND INFORMATION REGARDING EMPLOYEES, EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES ALL OF WHICH MAY BE ACCESSED THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 27, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 22, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 5, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 28, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 21, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 21, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance