USPTO serial 75488147
SEALIGHTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEALIGHTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURENCE P COLTON
LAURENCE P COLTON TECHNOPROP COLTON LLCP O BOX 567685ATLANTA, GA 31156-7685UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | life-saving equipment and devices, namely, electronic devices and instruments for sea-distress rescue, for signaling distress situations and for signaling emergency situations, in the nature of electronic signaling and positioning apparatuses, beacons and radios, life buoy markers, and distress whistles | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | devices for diffusing colored dye to seawater to indicate location, and devices for generating smoke for signaling | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | pyrotechnical signaling devices for signaling distress and emergency situations, namely, pyrotechnical devices for throwing lines, pyrotechnical devices for launching signal rockets and illumination rockets, signal rockets, illumination rockets, pyrotechnical devices for firing signal cartridges and pyrotechnical illumination cartridges, signal cartridges, and pyrotechnical illumination cartridges for illuminating dark skies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMET GmbH Pyrotechnik - Apparatebau
- Other trademarks owned by COMET GmbH Pyrotechnik - Apparatebau
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Similar marks named SEALIGHTS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |