USPTO serial 75488191
DIVINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIVINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAN JENSEN
JAN JENSEN CHRISTENSEN MILLER FINK JACOBS, ET AL2121 AVE OF THE STARS18TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | A series of pre-recorded musical sound recordings and compact discs featuring rhythm and blues and pop music | ACTIVE | Jul 3, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |