USPTO serial 75488612
PLATINUM ERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLATINUM ERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATTHEW W. WALCH
MATTHEW W WALCH LATHAM & WATKINS5800 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN BUSINESS APPLICATIONS AND ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING, AND INSTRUCTION AND USER MANUALS SOLD IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |