USPTO serial 75488841
PACKETWRITER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2474585Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2001
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PACKETWRITER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Marlborough, MA
Marlborough, MA
INTERACT911 MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC.
WINSTON-SALEM, NC
Marlborough, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer M. Mikulina
Jennifer M. Mikulina McDermott Will & Emery LLP227 W. Monroe StreetSuite 4400Chicago, IL 60606-5096Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for use with wireless information systems for creating, submitting and approving reports | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 28, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cerulean Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cerulean Technology, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERACT911 MOBILE SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BIO-KEY INTERNATIONAL, INC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PACKETWRITER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 16, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |