USPTO serial 75489009
FOUNDERS BANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOUNDERS BANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN R CROSSAN
JOHN R CROSSAN Crossan IP Law, LLC444 N Michigan Ave., #2600CHICAGO, IL 60611-3903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | RETAIL BANKING AND TRUST SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jun 29, 1984 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CU.T | CONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CU.M | CONCURRENT USE DISSOLVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CU.I | CONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |