USPTO serial 75489048
COBRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COBRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Telford TF& 4NY, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH F SCHMIDT
JOSEPH F SCHMIDT LAFF WHITESEL CONTE & SARET LTD401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | SEATS FOR AUTOMOBILES AND REPLACEMENT PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1979 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 31, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |