USPTO serial 75489079
AMORE DI AMORETTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEEGARS, GERALD C.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMORE DI AMORETTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID WEISS
2551 COLORADO BLVDLOS ANGELES, CA 90041-1040UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | liqueurs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Barsoumian, Maral
- Other trademarks owned by Barsoumian, Maral
- Other trademarks owned by Barsoumian, Hagop
- Other trademarks owned by Barsoumian, Hagop
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named AMORE DI AMORETTI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 16, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2001 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |