USPTO serial 75489182
ICE STATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ICE STATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nerima-ku, Tokyo, JP
Nerima-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERTA S BREN
ROBERTA S BREN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3454UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Applied electronic machines and apparatus, namely testing machines and apparatus for large scale integrated circuits and apparatus for large scale integrated circuits and other semi-conductors; electronic circuits; blank magnetic disks and magnetic disks with prerecorded programs for operating the aforesaid electronic machines and apparatus | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |