USPTO serial 75489291
ETOPIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ETOPIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London SW6 5UQ, GB
London SW6 5UQ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LOWELL ANDERSON
ROSANNA PIAZZA EXEC ASST TO CEO BIBLIOTECH LIMITED50 CARNWATH RDLONDON, ENG SW6 3EGUNITED KINGDOMGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA ON-LINE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |