Drawing for KIDS

USPTO serial 75489629

KIDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KIDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HARRIET E PERKINS

HARRIET E PERKINS SEIDEL, GONDA, LAVORGNA & MONACO, PC1800 TWO PENN CTR PLZPHILADELPHIA, PA 19102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bath products, namely, bubble bath, body wash, anti-bacterial soap and hand sanitizing non-medicated lotion soap; skin care products, namely, lotions and non-medicated lip balm, and hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, gels, and detanglersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 8, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 22, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 25, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2001REINREINSTATED—
May 23, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 9, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 23, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 10, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 10, 2000OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 23, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 30, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 1, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 5, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance