Drawing for PUREROAST

USPTO serial 75489901

PUREROAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2339348Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 4, 2000
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUREROAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GARY R DUVALL

STEPHANIE J SIMMONS LANE POWELL SPEARS LUBERSKY LLPSTE 2100601 SW SECOND AVEPORTLAND, OR 97204-3158

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Ground and whole bean coffeeSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDMay 12, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2003C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2000R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jan 24, 2000CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance