USPTO serial 75490298
BROADCAST.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BROADCAST.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RUFFIN B CORDELL
RUFFIN B CORDELL FISH & RICHARDSON601 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising services, namely, distributing advertisements for others in connection with digital programming over wired and wireless networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | communications services, namely, providing transmission of digitized audio and video analog/digital signals in the nature of digital programs of sports, radio, television, entertainment, corporate, business and music events and talk shows by means of wired and wireless networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, distribution of digital programming for others of sports, radio, television, entertainment, corporate, business and music events and talk shows in digitized audio and video analog/digital signal form by means of wired and wireless networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |