USPTO serial 75491060
CONWAY STEWART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONWAY STEWART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Devon PL20 7TT, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOUGLAS W SPRINKLE
DOUGLAS W SPRINKLE GIFFORD KRASS GROH SPRINKLE PATMOREANDERSON & CITKOWSKI PC280 N OLD WOODWARD AVE STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009-5394Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | COSMETICS, NAMELY, LIPSTICK, MASCARA, KOHL PENCILS, FACE POWDER, EYEBROW PENCILS, EYE SHADOW, NAIL POLISH, ROUGE, FOUNDATION; TOILETRIES, NAMELY, HAIR SHAMPOO, HAIR CONDITIONER, HAIR SPRAY, HAIR MOUSSE, HAIR STYLING LOTIONS, BEAUTY MASKS, FACIAL CREAMS AND LOTIONS, HAIR COLORANTS, MAKE-UP REMOVER, MOUTHWASHES, TOOTHPASTE, SUNTANNING LOTIONS; AND SOAPS, NAMELY, ANTIPERSPIRANT SOAP, DEODORANT SOAP, AND TOILET SOAP | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | ORGANIZERS, NAMELY, DESK TOP ORGANIZERS, PERSONAL ORGANIZERS AND STATIONERY ORGANIZERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | BAGS, NAMELY, ATHLETIC BAGS, TOTE BAGS, BEACH BAGS, DUFFEL BAGS, AND HAND BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |