Drawing for ARIEL

USPTO serial 75491831

ARIEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARIEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN

MARTIN R GREENSTEIN TECHMARK55 S MARKET ST 16TH FLSAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computers; micro-comuters and micro-computer memory modules; embedded systems; computer chips integrated circuits and circuit boards; computer firmware and computer programs, namely operating system software, compilers assemblers, program and application development software, computer programming development tools and computer utilities for use in designing and implementing computer programs for real-time applications, for multitasking, for symmetric and transparent multiprocessing applications and for dedicated hardware-specific applications; computer programming tools for use in developing, maintaining, enhancing and operating computers, embedded systems, computer programs and computer systems, and utilities programs, and user manuals sold therewith as a unit, and computer consulting services; computer technical support services, namely providing users assistance in the nature of help desk services, providing software updates and fixes and assistance in adapting software programs to new hardware platforms and interfacing with new applications; computer software design and development for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 31, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 31, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 3, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 19, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 8, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 9, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 9, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 13, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 30, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance