Drawing for NEXSYSTEMS

USPTO serial 75492321

NEXSYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NEXSYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TERESA M BEASLEY

TERESA M BEASLEY WALTER & HAVERFIELD LLP50 PUBLIC SQ STE 1300CLEVELAND, OH 44113-2253UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of others by organizing and conducting frequent buyer and user programs in the field of travelACTIVEOct 5, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 27, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2001PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 3, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 3, 2000PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 5, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance